what im doin

hannah montana satire...and idk what else....give me ideas

news

these are stories that i'm really insterested in doing:

-coheed and cambria concert (11/17)
-new coheed album "No World For Tomorrow" (10/23)
-austin film festival (10/11 and 10/12)
-firekills and chevelle show (10/18)
-tool concert (11/14)
-doobie brothers show (10/26)
-smashing pumpkins show (11/02)
-"saw IV" movie (10/26)
-"30 days of night" movie (10/19)

the camera

VS.

a pinhole camera and a single lens camera are very dfferent. the slr is obviously way more high tech; the zoom is adjustable and the photo is more precise and on point. the actual pinhole on the oatmeal box controls the light exposure and the flap lets you adjust the time the light is being reflected to the paper; this gives the photo better exposure control, so the pic doesn't come out really light or dark. However, the slr has a flash for the dark objects and it reads the exposure amount so that you dont have too much or too little. so, all in all, the slr is much better, but the pinhole works exceptionally well for being jus an oatmeal box

pinhole pics

this photo is very wearped, but in an artsy way. the shadows create a kind of creepy look to it which makes it interesting . the trees are blurred and out of focus, but the building is very sharp. this puts emphasise on the building, making it the main element of the photo. although some of the picture is over exposed, the darker spots and lighter spots blend and make it seem like thats the way it was supposed to be.

this photo isn't very warped but is very blurry. Most of the picture is overexposed and black, which hides any details in the picture. the photo also is very faded and unclear. the only thing this picture shows is a wall and an opening. it's very plain and has alot of extra space that's very bland and irrelevant to the actual photo.

this is wut i think

This picture is about a 4, maybe 3.5. The main element is a tiny bit fuzzy, but the expression on her face shows that she's talking. She's not looking at the camera and, instead, she's looking at her audience. Her hand is a little blurred, which shows motion. The frame is pretty much filled, except for some blank ceiling space in the top-right corner. And the angle shows her face well, but not straight on.

This picture, however, isn't so great; it would be almost a 2, like 1.8. For starters, the photographer was WAY too far back. The main element doesn't fill the frame, but is talking to her audience and not looking at the camera. But, because she's so far, you can barely see the expression or detail in her face. The distance leaves alot of junk left in the picture, such as the computers, bookshelfs, tables, and another room; all of this doesn't have to be in the picture. And the angle is almost directly from the right, which only shows half of her face and emphasizes on her ear and cheek.

welcome to my blog YO!